Image from this Whipped Ass gallery.
With the last post and the post that’s coming up next, I have to sandwich a little of the real stuff in between. I’ve been peeping new galleries and have a bunch of *very* explicit faves in tabs clogging up my browser — it’s time to share. All the galleries in this post have accompanying videos. Free pr0n noms!
Hot oral, BDSM girl-girl activity is in this entertaining Whipped Ass gallery. My pal Dana DeArmond — cute, in glasses — gets some serious backdoor pleasure in lovely rope bondage in this Hogtied gallery. I don’t know if it’s wank-worthy, but it’s breathtaking: this rope bondage gallery outdoor in the snow. More of the tied-up variety — but I think Lillacat’s orgasms are hot in this gallery — I recognize her from the Art of Restraint event I went to last month (and I have a bit of a crush on her). I almost could not believe the outrageousness of this for-real public, in-the-streets Public Disgrace shoot. Wow. Then over at the new Everything Butt site, I liked this amateur-looking bootie-focused girl-girl domme/sub scene. And if you want to see something intense — but still smiley — you won’t want to miss what Madison Young does with her own fist in this gallery. Damn, girl!
I call them gratuitous in the sense that they — the posts themselves, why I keep the word “post” in the subject — are flamboyantly unnecessary. not the porn itself. I agree that porn made to be porn can’t truly be gratuitous by nature. but you have to admit (and this is my feeling) that “gratuitous post of porn” doesn’t have the same ring in a subject line, even if it’s ‘more’ correct.
You know, I have the same problem with this post as I do with the the “Gratuitous Nudes” that Fleshbot posts. Which is, how can any porn post, especially one including stuff from kink.com, be truly gratuitous?